tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5504870940316490525.post8597446604867466120..comments2023-09-12T11:22:13.040-04:00Comments on Mortgages & Foreclosures: California Bankruptcy Judge Denies Pretender-Lender Lift-Stay ReliefAttorney Gregory Brylhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16046963272523751910noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5504870940316490525.post-76415644605107121942012-02-08T21:57:20.055-05:002012-02-08T21:57:20.055-05:00Do you delinquent borrowers really think this case...Do you delinquent borrowers really think this case helps you just because Judge Mann found against the lender on the motion? Good Lord. We cite it all the time in our favor, because it establishes that a lender has standing to get relief from the bankruptcy stay just by virtue of the recorded trustee's deed upon sale -- regardless of all the smokescreens you raise about robosigners and whatnot. (Bottom line: Did you make your mortgage payments or didn't you? "I made my mortgage payments" is the one defense I have NEVER heard asserted by you people. Unfortunately, it's the only viable defense.) Every time one of these newly appointed upstart judges in the Central District starts in with me about standing, I hit him with Salazar and its progeny -- and believe me, a zillion cases lined up to agree with Salazar -- and I win. I do love me some Judge Mann.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5504870940316490525.post-42382864447019424312011-04-18T04:05:58.160-04:002011-04-18T04:05:58.160-04:00All assets must be disclosed in bankruptcy schedul...All assets must be disclosed in bankruptcy schedules whether or not the debtor believes the asset has a net value. This is because once a bankruptcy petition is filed, it is for the creditors, not the debtor to decide whether a particular asset has value. The future ramifications of omitting assets from schedules can be quite serious for the offending debtor.Schaumburg attorneyhttp://www.changandcarlin.com/schaumburg-attorneynoreply@blogger.com