Monday, December 20, 2010

Faulty Securitization is a Nationwide Time Bomb

Big Banks Get More Subpoenas in Mortgage Probe

U.S. regulators have opened a new line of inquiry in their mortgage foreclosure probe and are asking big Wall Street banks about the beginning stages of mortgage securitization, two sources familiar with the probe said.

The Securities and Exchange Commission launched the new phase of its investigation by sending out a fresh round of subpoenas last week to big banks like Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo, the sources said.

The subpoenas focus on the earliest stage of the mortgage securitization process, said the sources, who requested anonymity because the probe is not public.

The sources said the SEC is asking for information about the role of so-called master servicers — specialized firms that oversee the selection and maintenance of the large pool of home loans that go into every mortgage-backed bond.

In many cases, Wall Street banks that underwrite mortgage-backed securities either own their own master servicing firms or are closely aligned with one.

In the fall, the SEC began looking into the banks' foreclosure practices following allegations that mortgage servicers like Bank of America were using shoddy paperwork to evict delinquent borrowers from their homes.

The Justice Department, banking regulators and the attorneys general in all 50 U.S. states are also probing potential wrongdoing.

One of the sources said the SEC is seeking information about the role banks had in mortgage securitization. The regulator is also looking at the role trustees for the trusts that issued the mortgage-backed securities had in monitoring the performance of the underlying loans.

The SEC is looking at whether loans were properly transferred to the trusts that issued the securities, the source said.

The renewed look at the securitization process is an extension of the SEC's preliminary probe into the mortgage mess. The SEC's regional offices are all looking at some aspect of the foreclosure crisis.

The SEC had no comment.

Separately, the SEC is still investigating banks, credit rating agencies and individuals in connection with the 2007-09 subprime crisis. Those investigations center on potential misrepresentations to investors about the value of the mortgage-backed securities that helped fuel the crisis.

The agency has filed some high-profile cases, including one against former Countrywide Financial chief Angelo Mozilo and another against Goldman Sachs.

Banking regulators, including the Federal Reserve, are feverishly reviewing lenders' foreclosure practices and are expected to reveal their findings in January.

In particular, the Fed is concerned about investors accusing lenders of misrepresenting the loans that underpin mortgage securities, and demanding repayment.

That has already happened with Bank of America, which has started negotiating with a group of angry mortgage investors, including BlackRock.

Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan and Goldman had no comment. Wells Fargo said it is "always working with regulators and others who are interested in its servicing business" but declined to comment on whether the bank had received a subpoena.

© 2010 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.
Original post: 
http://www.moneynews.com/Headline/SEC-Subpoenas-Mortgage-Probe/2010/12/17/id/380277#ixzz18UKTS94F

Read more: Big Banks Get More Subpoenas in Mortgage Probe 

Friday, December 17, 2010

How the government is screwing us (taxpayers) through Fannie, Freddie, and TARP

If you have any doubts whether the bailout was a bad thing, watch this:

http://cop.senate.gov/hearings/library/hearing-121610-geithner.cfm

Highlight: "TARP was former Wall Street executives bailing out current Wall Street executives."

Can you void a deed of trust (security) that has been split from the note?

As I stated numerous times to clients and attorneys alike, I believe that the "split note" theory is a loser 99% of the time, at least in most states, including Virginia (because most states do not require mortgage assignments to be recorded).  However, in certain instances it is possible to truly "split" the deed of trust from the note and render the note unsecured.  Our sister jurisdiction DC has such a case.  I am posting it here in hopes that maybe some homeowners or attorneys will find it helpful in their particular situation. 

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Empty/Inflated/Defective Securitization Pools Are Not New

If you think securitization fraud and multiple pooling of the same loan are new, think again... Here's a case from 1986. Ironically, even the culprit's name points to a prior incarnation of one of the modern players: Lehman (by the way, it should be pronounced "lemon").  As with a junky, "lemon" car, it's all in the name...

Enjoy the stimulating reading..., especially how Lemons maintained two sets of books to conceal multiple "recycling" of the same financial instruments to stuff investor pools... 

BANKS HAVE ALL THE RIGHTS; YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS

PROPERTY RIGHTS CRISIS: "THE BANKS ARE OWED ZERO"

BANKS SELLING NON-CONFORMING (JUNK) LOANS TO GOV, BETTING AGAINST THE JUNK, AND THEN DOCTORING PAPERS TO TAKE HOMES

WALL ST POWER OVER WASHINGTON; RAMPANT FORECLOSURE FRAUD; SECOND REAL ESTATE COLLAPSE

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Anat Admati, in his post on 12/4/2010 on Baseline Scenario, makes a point that by its monetary policies of the past decade our government has been subsidizing risk.  See the full post here:http://baselinescenario.com/2010/12/04/what-jamie-dimon-won%E2%80%99t-tell-you-his-big-bank-would-be-dangerously-leveraged/
I would go even further and say that, by its policies (as addressed in my previous post "Who Cased The Financial Crisis), our government is sponsoring FRAUD (i.e. risk raised to 100%).  Indeed, once you are a bank and are subsidized to use leverage and take risk, why not make the risk 100% by creating a junk loan bound to fail and immediately dump it on the federal government? You make money on your fees, and the tax payer picks up the tab when the loan fails.  Ain't that a brilliant system...

Thursday, December 9, 2010