Similarly, in Huck v. Countrywide Home Loans Inc.,
3:09-cv-00643
(D. Nev., 2010), the court wrote:The Court denies the motion to dismiss . . . because there remains a question of fact as to statutory defect in foreclosure. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 107.080(2)(c). The entity who filed the NOD is not the original trustee or beneficiary, nor is there any evidence indicating the entity who filed the NOD was the agent or successor of one of these entities. This supports an injunction, so long as Plaintiffs are willing to do equity by making full monthly payments during the injunction period.
No comments:
Post a Comment